This piece is featured in The D.C. Brief, TIME’s political newsletter. Subscribe to receive similar stories directly in your inbox.
To date, the Speaker has demonstrated exceptional skill in preventing his unruly faction of dissenters from disrupting the House, a proficiency that last week again frustrated attempts by several Republican agitators to challenge President Donald Trump’s wishes. However, this essential aptitude of the Speaker might reach its limit by the close of this month.
Last Tuesday, Kentucky Representative Tom Massie put forth a proposal aiming to compel a full House vote on legislation that would mandate the Department of Justice to disclose all information pertaining to the discredited financier Jeffrey Epstein and his accusers of sexual abuse. The following day, Epstein’s alleged victims gathered to amplify awareness for Massie’s discharge petition, and it proved effective. The rally became a major topic in Washington, as numerous women shared explicit accounts of their experiences with Epstein, thereby increasing pressure on the House to act.
“I implore you, President Trump and members of Congress: why do we persist in concealing sexual abuse and assault? Who are we shielding?” stated accuser Chauntae Davies. “Allow the public to learn the truth. Healing is impossible without justice. Safeguarding the future is unattainable if we decline to face the past.”
Forcing a vote requires 218 signatures on Massie’s petition. Currently, only four Republicans—Massie, alongside Representatives Lauren Boebert of Colorado, Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, and Nancy Mace of South Carolina—have endorsed the initiative. It is broadly anticipated that all 212 Democrats will sign, bringing the total to 216—a mere two signatures shy. The House has four vacant seats, and three of these are almost guaranteed to favor Democrats. Should Democrats secure the districts of the late Rep. in Virginia and the late Rep. Raúl Grijalva in Arizona, the necessary support will be achieved. Both of these special elections are scheduled for this month. A third reliably Democratic district, previously held by the late Rep. from Texas, will have its vote in November.
Massie has gained a reputation as a House dissenter. Two years prior, he was a lone voice against a resolution denouncing anti-Semitism. In January, he cast the sole Republican vote against Johnson for Speaker. Discharge petitions remain active as long as their proponent keeps them on the agenda, indicating this situation could evolve into a trial of determination between Massie and a Speaker he opposed.
Although the group advocating for the release of files might have the moral high ground, Washington continues to operate under Trump’s influence, and numerous avenues exist to obstruct legislation he disfavors. Even if the proposal manages to pass the House, the Senate poses a significant impediment, particularly with Majority Leader John Thune’s considerable influence. Most bills still need 60 votes to advance, and there is no indication of such substantial Senate backing for a move that would so overtly challenge Trump. Furthermore, it is inconceivable that Trump would acquiesce and enact Massie’s bill into law, rendering the entire endeavor a legislative impracticality.
Nevertheless, the fact that the measure remains an active possibility suggests that Trumpism is encountering a challenging period.
From his campaign endeavors to his time in the West Wing, Trump fueled the circulation of insinuations suggesting a global conspiracy orchestrated an Epstein-led sex trafficking operation. Upon regaining power, Trump attempted to control the narrative, yet every effort he made to suppress it only produced the contrary outcome. The situation simply carries too much explosive appeal: affluent playboys, sexual misconduct, and vulnerable children.
Earlier this summer, Johnson sent his members home prematurely for recess to circumvent a problematic vote on an Epstein bill, hoping this would allow the issue to subside. However, the controversy persisted. Last week, Johnson introduced a symbolic resolution instructing the House oversight committee to continue its investigation into Epstein. This was essentially a superficial solution, but it served its purpose temporarily. (On Friday, Johnson asserted Trump was a victim in the Epstein matter, though he later retracted this statement.)
The extent of the effort by GOP leaders to delay these developments is undeniable. This becomes even more remarkable when one considers other pressing matters on the chamber’s schedule—notably, the government’s funding expires by month’s end.
Presently, Trump appears to have achieved his objective, and Johnson has postponed the issue. This temporary surge, however, reveals underlying apprehension within Johnson’s exceptionally narrow majority and the unpredictability of his support base. It remains unclear whether this bill is permanently defunct or merely dormant. History shows that fervent advocates can revive various causes.
However, in a legislative body where a Speaker possesses significant power to exact retribution, pushing an issue too far can jeopardize a member’s career. Two initial votes opposing Johnson’s Speakership were reversed following intense persuasion from the White House. Massie, however, did not yield and lost his position on the influential Rules Committee, though he characterized it as a self-initiated departure. Johnson has unequivocally stated his desire to avoid this matter under his leadership.
Trump has denounced this act of defiance as intolerable. Should Johnson allow this situation to persist for much longer, Trump could very likely seek his removal.
Understand the significant developments in Washington. .