The escalating tensions between Israel and Iran have numerous consequences, spanning humanitarian and geopolitical realms. Should the conflict intensify, it could significantly impact energy markets, thereby affecting climate change and the transition to cleaner energy sources.
Oil prices are a crucial factor. They have surged by nearly 25% in the past month due to the heightened hostilities. Iran is a major oil supplier, producing 4 million barrels daily. Traders are concerned about potential supply disruptions. A larger conflict could lead to even higher prices due to supply concerns across the region, especially with increased difficulties in traversing the Strait of Hormuz.
While governments heavily influence energy production and consumption, energy markets are still driven by fundamental principles, particularly price sensitivity. Crude oil prices are perhaps the most closely watched in these markets. However, the effects of high oil prices on decarbonization efforts are complex, presenting both opportunities and challenges.
On one hand, high oil prices encourage investment in alternative energy sources, like electrification. Consumers might consider electric vehicles to save money on gasoline or opt for smaller, more fuel-efficient cars, which benefits the climate. Companies may also re-evaluate the feasibility of replacing diesel in heavy industries.
On the other hand, high oil prices can incentivize fossil fuel companies to increase drilling to capitalize on the increased profits. Projects that were previously deemed too expensive become more appealing as prices rise.
These factors are unlikely to unfold predictably. The situation in 2022, when oil prices spiked after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, offers a relevant parallel, quickly changing the discussion around clean energy.
Clean energy advocates argued that renewable sources could provide stability as Europe sought to reduce its reliance on Russian energy. In the U.S., they asserted that renewables would enhance energy security. These arguments helped advance clean energy, even if they weren’t the sole deciding factor. The RePowerEU initiative, launched after the invasion, accelerated the growth of wind and solar power in Europe. Energy security was also a key argument in the passage of the .
However, oil companies largely avoided bringing new oil production online, as the duration of the high-price environment was uncertain. Executives realized they could profit from higher prices without the risk of large new investments. We can expect Trump to intensify pressure on the industry to increase drilling to lower prices (Biden did this, too), but so far, the industry has largely resisted these demands.
So, how should companies interpret the oil price dynamic? It’s important to focus on the long-term trends. The International Energy Agency’s annual , released this week, indicates that the market is well-supplied in the medium term, even with growing demand, due to planned output increases from the U.S., Canada, Brazil, Guyana, and Argentina.
For companies, the volatility underscores the key advantages of renewable energy: it’s locally sourced and not subject to geopolitical disruptions. While production levels may fluctuate with weather conditions, prices can be fixed for decades, shielding them from the volatility of global commodity prices.
To get this story in your inbox, subscribe to the TIME CO2 Leadership Report newsletter .
“`