This article is part of The D.C. Brief, TIME’s politics newsletter. Sign up to get stories like this sent to your inbox.
Following the election, Democrats faced significant setbacks. Initial optimism about a Kamala Harris presidency, House control, and Senate majority proved unfounded.
Post-election vote counts revealed a different reality: Donald Trump’s re-election, a narrow Republican House majority, and Republican Senate control, including committee leadership and Cabinet appointments. Democrats’ financial resources proved inadequate, leaving them struggling to formulate a clear strategy.
Upcoming Senate confirmation hearings for Trump’s cabinet nominees present Democrats with an opportunity to define their approach.
Democrats plan to scrutinize nominees’ qualifications and Trump’s agenda. Senator Elizabeth Warren’s questioning of Pete Hegseth, Trump’s Pentagon pick, exemplifies this strategy.
This approach, Democrats believe, can be applied to other nominees like Tulsi Gabbard and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. While not aiming to block all nominees, Democrats hope to challenge some sufficiently to make Trump reconsider his choices. Matt Gaetz’s failed Attorney General bid, due to scrutiny of his past, serves as a precedent.
Trump initially aimed for a fully appointed Cabinet on his inauguration day. However, delays due to incomplete background checks and paperwork have hampered this goal. Many Republican committee leaders are hesitant to hold hearings for nominees with incomplete applications.
Some Senate Republicans suggested proceeding with nominations despite incomplete paperwork, potentially benefiting nominees like Gabbard and Pam Bondi. Linda McMahon’s Education Department nomination is also pending, awaiting complete documentation.
Only a few Trump nominees are expected to assume their roles immediately: Marco Rubio as Secretary of State, Elise Stefanik as UN Ambassador, and John Ratcliffe as CIA director. Others face delays due to incomplete files or unconfirmed hearing dates, providing Democrats more time for review.
These hearings represent a crucial test of Democratic unity in opposing Trump’s agenda. While Democrats alone cannot block nominations if Republicans remain unified, they can challenge the notion of a Republican mandate. While some nominees are highly controversial (Hegseth, Gabbard, and RFK Jr.), most will face only limited Democratic opposition. The Democrats’ strategy involves focusing their efforts on the most controversial figures, aimed at potentially influencing midterm elections.
Make sense of what matters in Washington. .