President Trump’s recent actions, including imposing tariffs on allies and competitors, triggered market sell-offs and inflation concerns. This has increased the possibility of a recession.
The economic uncertainty might cause concern that climate action will be slowed. While businesses will likely focus on immediate financial concerns, it doesn’t necessarily mean they will abandon their climate programs.
Many companies have shifted their environmental efforts from mere investments or marketing tactics to financially driven initiatives with quick returns. The upcoming economic challenges will test whether companies will continue to invest in sustainability or revert to viewing climate programs as too costly.
The typical initial response of businesses to economic uncertainty is to conserve cash to prepare for future difficulties.
While climate programs may have once seemed expendable, the situation has changed. After the COVID-19 pandemic, companies emphasized climate change initiatives, and investors heavily funded ESG funds. The era of low interest rates and ESG investment led companies to make ambitious environmental commitments, some of which were unrealistic.
Recent years have brought adjustments. Some companies have reassessed their targets and scaled back, while others have increased their efforts, recognizing the financial benefits of sustainability. The primary advantage of sustainability initiatives during economic uncertainty is efficiency, which reduces both costs and emissions.
Another common recommendation for businesses during recessions is to seek strategic investment opportunities. Research indicates that strategic investments during downturns position companies for outperformance when the economy recovers. Climate and sustainability offer such opportunities. Companies are facing the financial consequences of climate change, such as weather-related damage and supply chain issues. Despite reduced regulatory pressure in the U.S., climate regulations remain significant globally, requiring multinational companies to prioritize sustainability.
To illustrate, during the 2011 recovery from the Great Recession, a Harvard Business School study found that “high sustainability” firms outperformed “low sustainability” firms over the preceding 20 years. In 2020, during the recovery from the COVID-induced recession, substantial funds flowed into ESG-focused investments.
However, the current economic uncertainty is largely driven by U.S. policy. The specific effects of Trump’s tariffs are still uncertain, though they will inevitably reshape the global clean technology supply chain.
Companies that integrate climate action with financial benefits may not only weather the economic challenges but also position themselves for long-term success in a world increasingly shaped by climate impacts and solutions.
(To get this story in your inbox, subscribe to the TIME CO2 Leadership Report newsletter .)
“`