
By: Lucas Caldwell
The 11-point gap between parents’ perceptions and their kids’ actual AI use isn’t just a number—it’s a ticking time bomb. Last month, a fellow editor in New York laughed off his teen’s “harmless” ChatGPT homework use. Days later, the kid admitted generating full essays and fake project visuals with AI tools. Stories like this aren’t rare; they’re the reality the FOSI survey throws in parents’ faces. Parents are flying blind while their kids experiment with AI’s creative and deceptive potential.
FOSI’s spring 2026 fourth wave report (Ipsos surveyed over 4,000 parents and 10-17yo kids in US and Australia) lays out the data. 27% of parents said their kids used generative AI in the past week—38% of kids reported using it themselves. Social media gaps follow: 46% parents vs 54% kids scrolling, 30% vs 38% posting. Even for schoolwork, parents think it’s safe, but kids do more unreported activity. The divide runs deep and steady.
US kids’ generative AI use has leveled off at 72% (down from 74% in wave 3 fall 2025, up 13 points from wave 1 fall 2024). Parents’ optimism about AI helping online safety dropped 10 points (from 52% to 42% over waves). Trust in tech firms is low: 27% parents believe they protect kids from harm, 41% kids rate them slightly better. 9 in 10 kids say they can turn to parents, and 92% kids/91% parents agree parents are responsible for safety education.
Tech giants like Apple, Google, TikTok, Roblox, Snap are FOSI members—Disney and TikTok supported the research. But parents don’t trust these firms. Most households prefer rules over software: 68% have at least one phone rule, only 49% use device controls. When controls exist, 81-86% of families say they work well, but rules are the first choice.
Countries differ on outside help. Australian families are nearly three times more likely than US ones to expect government involvement in safety ed (30% vs12%). Teachers matter more in Aus:64% see their role vs42% in US. This split shows cultural norms shape safety strategies—Aus leans on institutions, US on home.
If parents don’t start asking specific questions about their kids’ AI use weekly, the 11-point blind spot will turn into a permanent digital literacy gap for the next generation.
Author bio: Lucas Caldwell, tech opinion leader with millions of X followers, focusing on family digital safety and AI’s impact on youth.